a trial with out the primary defendant


Solely two alleged accomplices of the “stunning Alex”, Jérémy B. and Vincent B., should be tried for 2 days for forgery and complicity in using forgery in writing. Each seem free.

Alexandre Despallières, indicted for homicide, is lifeless and can ceaselessly be presumed harmless.

The accusation is nevertheless formal. Alexandre Despallières truly wished to seize the fortune of Peter Ikin […] going as far as to create a false will “for his profit”. The prosecution additionally argues that Alexandre Despallières had clearly talked about that “paracetamol was the popular technique of killing with out worrying”.

The previous companion of the boss of the file firm in Australia, was accused of getting poisoned the producer to take management of his fortune, estimated at ten million euros.

He was additionally prosecuted, like his accomplices, for forgery and use of forgery.

On November 12, 2008, Peter Ikin, a 62-year-old Australian millionaire, near Elton John and Madonna, was discovered lifeless in a Paris resort. The post-mortem concludes a pure dying. His physique is cremated on the request of his companion however towards the needs of his household.

Doubts come up concerning the circumstances of the producer’s dying and Gary Perritt, nephew and beneficiary of the deceased, lodges a homicide grievance with the Paris public prosecutor in December 2009. A toxicological evaluation then reveals a deadly dose of paracetamol within the blood of Peter Ikin.

Gary Perritt additionally doubts the sincerity of the deceased’s will and challenges the property earlier than a British court docket.

The “fable” of the “stunning Alex”

Alexandre Despallières first met Peter Ikin in 1988 when he was 20 years outdated. The 2 males had tied a quick idyll earlier than shedding sight of one another. They met once more in April 2008, in Sydney, on the initiative of Alexandre Despallières.

The “stunning Alex” would then have made Peter Ikin imagine that he had turn out to be extraordinarily wealthy and that he wished to bequeath his fortune to him as a result of he was dying of a mind tumor. Actually, Alexandre Despallières had not turn out to be wealthy and didn’t endure from any mind tumor.

The “fable” of Alexandre Despallières had led the 2 males to conclude, in October 2008 in the UK, a “civil partnership” (civil union) particularly making Alexandre Despallières the only legatee of the Australian producer.

To seal their union, the 2 companions had symbolically exchanged a examine for 50,000 kilos, promising to not money it. What Alexandre Despallières had nonetheless hastened to do. When Peter Ikin wished to money Alexandre Despallières’ examine in flip, the financial institution refused, because the Frenchman’s account was not funded.

The civil union contracted between the 2 males is just not acknowledged by Australian regulation.

To take away this impediment, Alexandre Despallières would have produced a false will, dated August 2008, with the assistance of Jérémy B and his companion on the time, Vincent B.

Vincent B. advised the investigators that Alexandre Despallières had made certain to make the doc “genuine” by “ageing” it on a radiator after which drying it within the solar.

Earlier than the investigators, Jérémy B. and Vincent B. claimed to have been “manipulated” by Alexandre Despallières. Vincent B. specified that he didn’t know what the doc represented and that furthermore he didn’t perceive English.

Due to this false will, “large transfers of funds”, of the order of two to a few million kilos, had been noticed from the accounts of Peter Ikin to these of Alexandre Despallières.

In December 2009, the Excessive Courtroom of Justice in London dominated, nevertheless, that solely the desire drawn up by Peter Ikin in Could 2002 was deemed legitimate and requested Alexandre Despallières to return the cash and property obtained, together with the tycoon’s residence in Chelsea and a number of other Porsches.

Leave a Reply